So there was a round of layoffs, demotions and warning issued yesterday in relation to the Mas Selamat affair for Whitley Road Detention Centre personnel. From the two officers in charge of the man, to the supervisory officer, to the officer related to the installation of security cameras. But the thing that puzzles me most is this. The ISD's command director was relieved of his position, even though he was found innocent of wrong doing, on the basis that he was in charge of the facility, and thus had to bear responsibility for the issue.
Mr Wong said: "He has a statutory function to ensure the smooth functioning of the WRDC. So in terms of institutional responsibility, as far as that role is concerned, I decided that I should find another person to do the job."
Going by this argument, then shouldn't Mr Wong also be relieved of his duties? After all, isn't it the institutional responsibility of the Minister of Home Affairs to ensure the smooth functioning of WRDC as well? Or the swift capture of Mas Selamat? A bit of double standard here, yes? He's just lucky Singaporean's don't go for the drama of other countries, where ministers have been protested out of office by the people and opposition.
I still don't get why Mas Selamat was in civvies at the time. It seems rather unusual for prisoners to be allowed to wear civilian garb simply because it is family day. And I'm not totally convinced by their story of the toilet break. The superintendent of the facility decides a sawn off handle is secure enough for a toilet in a prison compound, even if it is the visiting centre, as opposed to grilles. A bit difficult to swallow, to say the least. And that aside, that he managed to get over two, count em, TWO layers of fencing without being spotted by a guard or anything. I've been pass WRDC, and those are high fences, with lookout towers along them at intervals. Implausible yet.
Got to go off to work now, be back later to talk more with whatever else comes out.